The present study was designed to gather validity data on the Devereux Scales of Mental Disorders (DSMD) for distinguishing among children and adolescents with. Browse and Read Devereux Devereux Scales Of Mental Disorders Manual Devereux Devereux Scales Of Mental Disorders Manual Preparing the.

ALABAMA PARENTING QUESTIONNAIRE (APQ) Source(s) Child Welfare Information Gateway. Abuse-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for child physical abuse. Sabnzbd Download more. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from: Dadds, M., Maujean, A., & Fraser, J., (2003). Parenting and conduct problems in children: Australian data and psychometric properties of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Australian Psychologist, 38, 238-241.

Retrieved from: Elgar, F., Waschbusch, D., Dadds, M., & Sigvaldason, N. Development and validation of a short form of the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 243-259. Retrieved from: Frick, P., (2011). The Alabama Parenting Questionnaire. Retrieved from: Frick, P., Christian, R., & Wotton, J., (1999). Age trends in the association between parenting practices and conduct problems.

Behavior Modification, 23, 106-128. Retrieved from: Ham, J., (2003). The association between behavior problems, parenting practices, and sensory integration dysfunction.

Retrieved from: Measure Profile: Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ). Retrieved from: Rakow, A., Forehand, R., McKee, L., Coffelft, N., Champion, J., Fear, J., & Compas, B., (2010).

The relation of parental guilt induction to child internalizing problems when a caregiver has a history of depression. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 367-377. Retrieved from: Evaluation Methodology This measure is primarily intended to assess parenting practices across a number of domains. It can also be used to study the development and subsequent treatment of disruptive behaviour problems in children (Measure Profile, 2011). Measurement Characteristics Purpose To assess parenting practices relevant to child externalizing problems. Interpol Turn On The Bright Lights 10th Anniversary Rar Extractor. (Measure Profile, 2011) Description 42 self-reported responses, rated on a 5-point Likert scale- 1 (never) to 5 (always) for both child and parent forms (Measure Profile, 2011) Several versions of the APQ- Child Global Report, Parent Global Report, Child Telephone Interview, and Parent Telephone Interview.

(Frick, 2011) (sub) Scales Positive involvement with children (10 items), Supervision and monitoring (10 items), Use of positive discipline techniques (6 items), Consistency in the use of such discipline (6 items), Use of corporal punishment (3 items); Other discipline practices (7 items) (Measure Profile, 2011). Target Population Children ages 6-18 and parents of children ages 6-18 (Measure Profile, 2011). Psychometric Properties Dadds, Maujean, & Fraser (2003) did a large-scale study with 804 4- to 9-year-olds from a number of elementary schools in Brisbane, Australia.

The participants came from a variety of socio-economic and ethnic backgrounds. The study provides means and standard deviations separately for genders and two age groups (4- to 6-year-olds and 7- to 9-year-olds) The authors originally reported internal consistency coefficients ranging from 0.09 to 0.95 and test-retest reliability coefficients from 0.66-0.89. The authors note that the Corporal Punishment subscale shows particularly low internal consistency, likely due to the fact that it has only three items.

Without this subscale included, internal consistency improves substantially. Other studies have found internal consistencies ranging from 0.54-0.0.83. Test-retest reliability has also been reported by others as 0.84-0.90 (Measure Profile, 2011). The authors reported evidence of convergent validity, and this has been supported by a number of other studies. Other studies have also demonstrated moderate to extensive divergent and concurrent validities (Measure Profile, 2011). Administration Factors 12-20 minutes Languages Chinese, Dutch, English, German, Norwegian, Spanish (European), and Spanish (Mexican) (Measure Profile, 2011).

Availability of Measure Available free of charge from: Author grants permission for use but requests that researchers send him a description of any research done with the measure once it is completed so that he may include the data in a database he keeps on the measure (Measure Profile, 2011). Pros A past study (Dadds, Maujean & Fraser) indicated that 'parents as a whole scored across the full range of scores on all of the subscales' (2003). The authors concluded that this finding reinforced past studies that stated, 'social desirability does not largely influence a parent’s report of parenting style. A valid prima facie concern might be that parents would be unwilling to endorse the use of inconsistent and harsh discipline, and would want to emphasise high levels of positive strategies' (Dadds, Maujean & Fraser, 2003). They conclude '[t]he extent to which this can be said about parents involved in severe parent-child conflict and perhaps abusive practices, remains unknown'. It is questionable if Priority Access cases would fall under the category of 'severe parent-child conflict'. Relatively short- 42 items.